IvanHoe-57b

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
Post Reply
Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

IvanHoe-57b

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Tue Jun 22, 2010 5:38 pm

IvanHoe-57b w32 MP and IvanHoe-57b X64 MP UCI-Engines (ZIP).
Attachments
IvanHoe-57b-x64.zip
IvanHoe-57b X64 MP
(164.33 KiB) Downloaded 406 times
IvanHoe-57b-w32.zip
IvanHoe-57b w32 MP
(169.73 KiB) Downloaded 421 times
Peace be with you!

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:02 pm

Source-Code IvanHoe v57b.
Attachments
Source-Code.zip
Source-Code IvanHoe v57b
(194.72 KiB) Downloaded 277 times
Peace be with you!

User avatar
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by kingliveson » Tue Jun 22, 2010 6:06 pm

PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Tue Jun 22, 2010 7:01 pm

kingliveson wrote:This was already posted here: http://open-chess.org/viewtopic.php?p=2000#p2000
In your Link (with Download-Links) is not clear that it is not 57a, but 57b!
Peace be with you!

User avatar
xshat
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 am

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by xshat » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:12 pm

I can't find the 57b source on Ippolit's wiki was this made by someone else?

User avatar
kingliveson
Posts: 1388
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:22 am
Real Name: Franklin Titus
Location: 28°32'1"N 81°22'33"W

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by kingliveson » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:48 pm

There is no 57b source/compile. All the binaries are named 9.xxb internally, where 9 represents 9999, xx is last 2 numbers of the released source (999957), and b is simply beta. Just like previous releases were 9.58b, 9.63b, 9.64b, 9.65b, 9.66b, 9.67b, 9.68b, 9.70b, 9.73b, 9.76b, 9.81b, 9.84b, 9.87b. The next will also be named 9.xxb. Hope the confusion is clarified. The compiles are directly from original source without any changes that would affect integrity of the engine.
PAWN : Knight >> Bishop >> Rook >>Queen

Eduard Nemeth
Posts: 632
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 12:50 am

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by Eduard Nemeth » Tue Jun 22, 2010 8:59 pm

If you create the above engines as UCI, you will see in the engine window "Ivanhoe 9.57b", w32 or X64.

ED.
Peace be with you!

User avatar
xshat
Posts: 98
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 10:44 am

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by xshat » Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:03 pm

kingliveson wrote:There is no 57b source/compile. All the binaries are named 9.xxb internally, where 9 represents 9999, xx is last 2 numbers of the released source (999957), and b is simply beta. Just like previous releases were 9.58b, 9.63b, 9.64b, 9.65b, 9.66b, 9.67b, 9.68b, 9.70b, 9.73b, 9.76b, 9.81b, 9.84b, 9.87b. The next will also be named 9.xxb. Hope the confusion is clarified. The compiles are directly from original source without any changes that would affect integrity of the engine.
There is 99999957a source, but not 57b source? I have 57a source from Ippolit Wiki.

Vlad0
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:52 pm

Re: IvanHoe-57b

Post by Vlad0 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:08 pm

kingliveson wrote:There is no 57b source/compile. All the binaries are named 9.xxb internally, where 9 represents 9999, xx is last 2 numbers of the released source (999957), and b is simply beta. Just like previous releases were 9.58b, 9.63b, 9.64b, 9.65b, 9.66b, 9.67b, 9.68b, 9.70b, 9.73b, 9.76b, 9.81b, 9.84b, 9.87b. The next will also be named 9.xxb. Hope the confusion is clarified. The compiles are directly from original source without any changes that would affect integrity of the engine.
If this is true, then the compilation was made not by MS VC, but by another compiler? Which one: Intel or Mingw's gcc?
Was it somehow PGO optimized? (seems Yes, because its Kns is very good). In case, it was yet compiled by MS VS 2010 somehow , could You include the corresponding .vcxproj file into Your distribution , pls?

Post Reply