Page 13 of 16

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 7:38 am
by Homayoun
;)

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:19 pm
by Homayoun
Author: Gahtan Nahdi
Date: Tue Mar 26 18:17:00 2024 +0100
Timestamp: 1711473420

Remove material imbalance from nnue eval

Passed non-reg STC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 0526c52b57
LLR: 2.93 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 76480 W: 19893 L: 19712 D: 36875 Elo +0.82
Ptnml(0-2): 339, 9107, 19157, 9308, 329

Passed non-reg LTC:
https://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests/ ... 0526c53885
LLR: 2.95 (-2.94,2.94) <-1.75,0.25>
Total: 150948 W: 38078 L: 37988 D: 74882 Elo +0.21
Ptnml(0-2): 111, 16997, 41148, 17127, 91

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5135

Bench: 2103324

https://abrok.eu/stockfish/

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:55 pm
by Homayoun
Author: Disservin
Date: Fri Mar 29 13:13:07 2024 +0100
Timestamp: 1711714387

Improve prerelease creation workflow

In the last couple of months we sometimes saw duplicated prereleases uploaded to GitHub, possibly due to some racy behavior when concurrent jobs create a prerelease. This now creates an empty prerelease at the beginning of the CI and the binaries are later just attached to this one.

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5144

No functional change

https://abrok.eu/stockfish/

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:17 pm
by OrgZ
Author: Joost VandeVondele
Date: Sat Mar 30 12:38:02 2024 +0100
Timestamp: 1711798682

Avoid a note related to an ABI change

current master triggers a gcc note:
parameter passing for argument of type 'std::pair<double, double>' when C++17 is enabled changed to match C++14 in GCC 10.1

while this is inconsequential, and just informative https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111516 we can easily avoid it.

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5145

No functional change
see source: https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... 43bf21360e

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Sat Mar 30, 2024 3:45 pm
by Homayoun
OrgZ wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2024 2:17 pm
Author: Joost VandeVondele
Date: Sat Mar 30 12:38:02 2024 +0100
Timestamp: 1711798682

Avoid a note related to an ABI change

current master triggers a gcc note:
parameter passing for argument of type 'std::pair<double, double>' when C++17 is enabled changed to match C++14 in GCC 10.1

while this is inconsequential, and just informative https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111516 we can easily avoid it.

closes https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... /pull/5145

No functional change
see source: https://github.com/official-stockfish/S ... 43bf21360e
Thanks.

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:24 am
by Cr@ck
Friends, please tell me at what time controls STC and VLTC testing of Stockfish is carried out? It says that VLTC is carried out with control 60+0.6. Is it 60 minutes or 60 seconds per game?

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:40 am
by IbaiBuR
60+0.6 is 60 seconds + 0.6 seconds of increment per move. STC is usually 10+0.1.

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:43 am
by Homayoun
Cr@ck wrote:
Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:24 am
Friends, please tell me at what time controls STC and VLTC testing of Stockfish is carried out? It says that VLTC is carried out with control 60+0.6. Is it 60 minutes or 60 seconds per game?
What do you personally think?VLTC means , very long time control. Then it should be second or minute?
Regards

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:52 am
by Homayoun
Homayoun wrote:
Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:43 am
Cr@ck wrote:
Tue Apr 02, 2024 11:24 am
Friends, please tell me at what time controls STC and VLTC testing of Stockfish is carried out? It says that VLTC is carried out with control 60+0.6. Is it 60 minutes or 60 seconds per game?
What do you personally think?VLTC means , very long time control. Then it should be second or minute?
Regards
Ok. I think Ibay is right.with excuse I wrongly read 60+ 6. But if it is 60+ 0.6 , Then Ibay is right.
Regards

Re: Stockfish

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 12:08 pm
by Homayoun
Ibai