Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:24 am
Thank you very much, Tanick.
Greetings
Greetings
Page 9 of 14
Greetings
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 7:54 am
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 9:55 am
Thank you very much, Tanick!
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 1:02 pm
You are welcome chess friends
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:03 pm
Tanick Thank you for the nice job! Here are only positive impressions,
So thats why i made your engines collection:
Easy to install without using gui, just check from checkboxes and click to install button, thats all.
The CHECKED engines will be installed to folder:
"C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\ChessBase\Engines.UCI\Tanick_Ramz"
Best regards to ALL !
https://pixeldrain.com/u/dYAgR3kL
So thats why i made your engines collection:
Easy to install without using gui, just check from checkboxes and click to install button, thats all.
The CHECKED engines will be installed to folder:
"C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\ChessBase\Engines.UCI\Tanick_Ramz"
Best regards to ALL !
https://pixeldrain.com/u/dYAgR3kL
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:11 pm
Thank you dear Minutka15minutka15 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:03 pmTanick Thank you for the nice job! Here are only positive impressions,
So thats why i made your engines collection:
Easy to install without using gui, just check from checkboxes and click to install button, thats all.
These engines will be installed to folder:
"C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\ChessBase\Engines.UCI\Tanick_Ramz"
Best regards to ALL !
Tanick_Ramz_Collection.png
https://pixeldrain.com/u/dYAgR3kL
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:36 am
TEST BY Adrian
Hazard JigSaw v4.40_avx2 vs. SF-PRO 27-02-2024
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Hazard: nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue
Book Settings:
1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0
1 JigSaw v4.40_avx2 +1 +1/=499/-0 50.10% 250.5/500
2 SF-PRO -1 +0/=499/-1 49.90% 249.5/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/mmvpvjaf ... 5.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ!
Hazard JigSaw v4.40_avx2 vs. SF-PRO 27-02-2024
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Hazard: nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue
Book Settings:
1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0
1 JigSaw v4.40_avx2 +1 +1/=499/-0 50.10% 250.5/500
2 SF-PRO -1 +0/=499/-1 49.90% 249.5/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/mmvpvjaf ... 5.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ!
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 7:51 pm
Hello OrgZ,OrgZ wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:36 amTEST BY Adrian
Hazard JigSaw v4.40_avx2 vs. SF-PRO 27-02-2024
Processor AMD A10 – 9700 R7,10 Compute Cores 4C + 6G - 3.50 GHz - RAM 8.00 GB - 64-bit operating system - x64 processor - Windows 10 Pro - 1024 mb hash Fritz 16 GUI – Permanent Brain: OFF – Both Engines Play with 4 Threads and Large Pages - Opening Book: Perfect 2023 ctg - Final Tablebases: Syzygy 3-4-5 pieces – NNUE: Hazard: nn-b1a57edbea57.nnue and nn-baff1ede1f90.nnue
Book Settings:
1.Tournament ON
2.Min games 0-35
3.Variety of play 150
4.Influence of learn 100
5.Learning strength 500
DESKTOP-TORM2PL, Blitz 4min+1seg 0
1 JigSaw v4.40_avx2 +1 +1/=499/-0 50.10% 250.5/500
2 SF-PRO -1 +0/=499/-1 49.90% 249.5/500
Games in PGN: https://www.mediafire.com/file/mmvpvjaf ... 5.pgn/file
Congratulations OrgZ!
You yourself should understand perfectly well that winning one game is not a victory, besides, 500 games to check is also very little — if the gap was two, three or more winning games, then I would absolutely agree to lose, and just one game of advantage can hardly be called a victory.
Best regards.
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:12 pm
Hello@ Apocalypse
Take it easy. All of us know that all the tests in chess forums are considered as fun tests although we like them very much , consider them with great appreciation and respect. Also all of us know that the difference between strength of stockfish and all it’s derivatives is almost near the epsilon. All of them are very very strong and valuable. Also we know that fluctuation is the nature of all derivatives and non of them are stable as stockfish itself. For example we see one version of shashchess is very strong and wins all derivatives tournaments, then the next version is
Almost weak comparing with other derivatives. This fact is seen for all derivatives: Eman, Brainlearn, Hazard , SFpro and others. Also all of us know the value of authors and developers works, like you, Tanick, Anton and others. So, just take it easy.
Best regards
Take it easy. All of us know that all the tests in chess forums are considered as fun tests although we like them very much , consider them with great appreciation and respect. Also all of us know that the difference between strength of stockfish and all it’s derivatives is almost near the epsilon. All of them are very very strong and valuable. Also we know that fluctuation is the nature of all derivatives and non of them are stable as stockfish itself. For example we see one version of shashchess is very strong and wins all derivatives tournaments, then the next version is
Almost weak comparing with other derivatives. This fact is seen for all derivatives: Eman, Brainlearn, Hazard , SFpro and others. Also all of us know the value of authors and developers works, like you, Tanick, Anton and others. So, just take it easy.
Best regards
Re: Hazard Engines
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:56 pm
I am absolutely calm as a boa constrictor — I just said what I think and know about this.Homayoun wrote: ↑Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:12 pmHello@ Apocalypse
Take it easy. All of us know that all the tests in chess forums are considered as fun tests although we like them very much , consider them with great appreciation and respect. Also all of us know that the difference between strength of stockfish and all it’s derivatives is almost near the epsilon. All of them are very very strong and valuable. Also we know that fluctuation is the nature of all derivatives and non of them are stable as stockfish itself. For example we see one version of shashchess is very strong and wins all derivatives tournaments, then the next version is
Almost weak comparing with other derivatives. This fact is seen for all derivatives: Eman, Brainlearn, Hazard , SFpro and others. Also all of us know the value of authors and developers works, like you, Tanick, Anton and others. So, just take it easy.
Best regards
Regards.