Chess for Android 2.5

Discussion about chess-playing software (engines, hosts, opening books, platforms, etc...)
pj+
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:22 am

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by pj+ » Mon Feb 14, 2011 1:09 am

robbolito e4l dynamically compiled for froyo

http://www.speedyshare.com/files/268567 ... android.7z

User avatar
Swaminathan
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:14 pm

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by Swaminathan » Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:56 pm

Hi Aart,

Thanks for the details!
Sure I will mail you about the list of features I'd like to see implemented. :-)

Best regards,
Swami
Logo made by Ulysses P (Vytron)
Co-Authored with Dann Corbit: Strategic Test Suite

Damir Desevac
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:58 pm
Real Name: Damir Desevac

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by Damir Desevac » Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:06 pm

Any chance for Houdini Android ?

User avatar
AartBik
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:39 pm
Real Name: Aart Bik
Location: Mountain View, CA
Contact:

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by AartBik » Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:54 pm

pj+ wrote:robbolito e4l dynamically compiled for froyo
We now have two Robbolito's for Android, see screenshots below. Can you explain the difference between g3l and e4l? Is it worth starting an eng-eng match between the two?
Btw, I would remove the "x86" annotation in the Android compilation, as that is somewhat misleading :-)
Attachments
rob1.png
rob0.png

pj+
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:22 am

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by pj+ » Mon Feb 14, 2011 7:37 pm

I tested a little, e4l compile seemed to be a little faster. In my opinion e4 was the best robbolito version, at least in the limit of small time controls / slow hardware, from there it got worse. The differences between e4 and g3 is mostly time management and further code translation into English. With current available time controls in Chess for Android there should not be difference.
I compiled it mainly to see how to do it for Android with external libraries using ndk. Still did not figure out 'right ' way.

User avatar
AartBik
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:39 pm
Real Name: Aart Bik
Location: Mountain View, CA
Contact:

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by AartBik » Tue Feb 15, 2011 5:25 am

pj+ wrote:With current available time controls in Chess for Android there should not be difference.
You were right! It could not have been more even. Results of a 1-second per move match, 16MB hash, on a Nexus One.
Attachments
robbomatch.png

pj+
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:22 am

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by pj+ » Tue Feb 15, 2011 10:50 am

Tried to compile latest Ivanhoe 47c with ndk, no luck. Cross-compiling static executable is straightforward though, with usual huge number of warnings.
Seems to be slow,, don't know how strong it supposed to be.
I also put in archive 'x86' corrected robbolito e4l

http://www.speedyshare.com/files/26878872/IvanHoe47c.7z

User avatar
AartBik
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:39 pm
Real Name: Aart Bik
Location: Mountain View, CA
Contact:

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by AartBik » Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:28 pm

pj+ wrote:latest Ivanhoe 47c
Thanks. About 56KNs out of the opening.....
Attachments
ivan2.png
ivan1.png

User avatar
AartBik
Posts: 145
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:39 pm
Real Name: Aart Bik
Location: Mountain View, CA
Contact:

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by AartBik » Tue Feb 15, 2011 8:26 pm

Quick little tournament to get some idea (16MB hash, 1-second-per-move).

Code: Select all

                                R   S   I
RobboLito 0.085e4l             XXX 7.5  8   15.5/20
Stockfish 2.0                  2.5 XXX  7    9.5/20
IvanHoe-Beta version 999947c    2   3  XXX   5.0/20

User avatar
thorstenczub
Posts: 593
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:51 pm
Real Name: Thorsten Czub
Location: United States of Europe, germany, NRW, Lünen
Contact:

Re: Chess for Android 2.5

Post by thorstenczub » Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:09 pm

is the tournament handled by chess itself, or do you present the stats by your own?
because a tournament feature would the next i would wish :-)

Post Reply