opening books are completely harmless

[deeds]

...opponents play via Learning OFF...
...NON-learning as opponents...
...Both players have to be: Learning ON vs Learning ON...

Already answered here.
I use until 4 different learning engines as opponents since my 2nd learning session (15th learning session in progress...).
If the BIN book format hasn't a learning feature not my problem !
If some engines haven't a learning feature not my problem !

[deeds]

...Buy Fritz GUI...
...it's a paid GUI...
...Intall CTG (as opponents)

Already answered here.
No need another GUI to train learning engines and I already coded all the tools i needed for EXP files.

[deeds]

...Baron 3.0 book, it's so weak...

Not my problem !
They are a few BIN books which contains ECO B lines :

So this book is used to train my EXP files.

[Sedat Canbaz]

@to Deeds

Sorry, but I disagree with you with
Almost all.. what you wrote again!

And once more,
In your recent Deeds 2025 games openings,
You are missing almost all of strong lines!
But you are free, no any problem..but
Reality is reality...

And as clear proof about over:
That's why your used openings performed
Too badly..only via 80+ Elo edge engine,
They started to be balanced e.g via 50+%
Win. percentage !

If still not clear,
You can continue to work over 1980 models,
But remember that exc these old models, our
World contains much newer, better MODELS!!

That's ALL over... and hope HELPS!

[deeds]

...about this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=3&p=39742#p39742

...I was simply referring for your latest Deeds matches of 2025!...

You clearly said 2 times "always" :



So your lies have been proven true (evidence #1, evidence #2).

[deeds]

...you shared Videos on Youtube...
...I was referring NPS values games in PGN (not Videos)...

And i also shared tons of benchmark's results.
If the NPS ​​displayed in the GUI are not the same as those saved in the PGN file it's not my problem !

[deeds]

...In your recent Deeds 2025 games openings, You are missing almost all of strong lines!...

No matter what you expect.
I train several learning engines on different opening lists to cover a wide variety of openings.
Since my EXP file's accuracy improves with each new opening learned, everything is fine.

[Sedat Canbaz]

@ To Deeds

Is this as 1st APRIL Fool Joke ?)
I can understand if was yesterday )

And as I expected,
You have difficulties to learn.. anyhow and once more:
I was referring about your recent matches EXP vs BOOK

Moreover, I was referring also that since 2021 year:
I see nothing NEW about what Deeds shares here..

And as I stated earlier,
You are really a cherry picker! as cheater etc..due to many
Many well-experienced in our chess hobby are aware that
Learning ON vs Learning OFF is not fair at all !! and much
Boring, pointless, waste of time tests..at least for my side!

But anyhow, everyone is free..no One is slave )) but
Anyhow, SCCT is a good indicator regarding which
Professional work belonging to the best, strongest!

And as last words, sorry to say that too, but
I do not care so much about old, worse models..
Simply NOT in my nature..as usual, my mission:
To test and to determine who are one of best!
But unfortunately, you are far away to be so...!

Ok..that's all over..and I am pretty sure too,
You will publish/comment BLA BLA BLA again...
But frankly...this is NOT my problem at all !)

BYE-BYE

[Sedat Canbaz]

@ TO ALL PEOPLE

AND NOW IT'S TIME FOR 'DEEDS' TO
APOLOGIZE FROM ALL, FOR SAYING:

opening books are completely harmless

Because as we see,
Deeds is W-R-O-N-G again and again!

Greetings )

[ZamChess]

All the best Sedat !