I remember when you tested higher concurrency than 1, then learning "went backwards". Halfway through training you switched to concurrency = 1, learning went up, but the damage caused by concurrency > 1 did its job.
How about we have a little laugh ?
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
I remember when you tested higher concurrency than 1, then learning "went backwards". Halfway through training you switched to concurrency = 1, learning went up, but the damage caused by concurrency > 1 did its job.
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
Ah, I confused multipv with convergence... But I remember that you proved that concurrency greater than 1 "destroys" the experience file.
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
still having memory problemsSedat wrote: ...Since NNUE 2020, that means just a few years, someones started to use: Balanced / Unbalanced opening lines..
but before 2020 year, there was No such tern...

Jan 10, 2009 : Unbalanced opening leads to impressive top-level game
Mar 8, 2010 : English - Anglo-Dutch defense
May 30, 2014 : An aggressive opening is always unbalanced
Dec 12, 2015 : GM Hikaru Nakamura often plays provocative, unbalanced openings...
Aug 27, 2016 : Properties of unbalanced openings using Bayeselo model
etc.
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
sourceSedat wrote: ...I have no much idea about the differences But my 6th strong sense says that They should be close to each other...
But this Sedat's sixth sense has severe malfunctions :
ERROR MARGIN : 36% !!


ERROR MARGIN : 52% !!!Sedat wrote:...About your warnings, Listen, you're so new in my eyes...deeds wrote: Yet you had already been warned about this problem


Sedat wrote: I will create a book, which will be tuned to prefer Depth4 Exp Series, played in latest months of 2025!


-
- Posts: 2263
- Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
@To Deeds
Wow )) not bad 'search' by you ) but still not enough...since
I was referring about who are experienced in our Computer
Chess, such as by well-known testers who are from CCC, CCRL,
CEGT, CEDR, CSVN, FCP, FGRL, SPCC, SSDF, TCEC, TCERL, TOMs
Or other individuals TDs such as by Mehmet, Adam, Engeria,
Ipman, Jorge, RWBC, Sedat Canbaz, Sekos, Troid, Utzinger etc.
In other words, I never noticed that they used unbalanced term! sure
I mean before NNUE 2020..even if they used this term..not important..
But as most important thing is that, in case of unbalanced openings,
Almost all wins when via Whites.. understand ?) if still not clear ?
Chess is a game for 2 sides, at least it's so in my area where I live!
One thing more,
I am not going to share all Book Experts, because I may miss...
But just in case, the list will be full with Book Authors.. who
Never used to say: 'unbalanced' term, sure before NNUE 2020!
Btw, who knows? if you will continue to search, you may find,
Even who used during 1980s the unbalanced term) but anyhow
There is one true: Unbalanced / Balanced term became popular,
And it's started often used since NNUE 2020 for sure! However,
You will never know all about, since you was not active in past!
Hope helps )
Wow )) not bad 'search' by you ) but still not enough...since
I was referring about who are experienced in our Computer
Chess, such as by well-known testers who are from CCC, CCRL,
CEGT, CEDR, CSVN, FCP, FGRL, SPCC, SSDF, TCEC, TCERL, TOMs
Or other individuals TDs such as by Mehmet, Adam, Engeria,
Ipman, Jorge, RWBC, Sedat Canbaz, Sekos, Troid, Utzinger etc.
In other words, I never noticed that they used unbalanced term! sure
I mean before NNUE 2020..even if they used this term..not important..
But as most important thing is that, in case of unbalanced openings,
Almost all wins when via Whites.. understand ?) if still not clear ?
Chess is a game for 2 sides, at least it's so in my area where I live!
One thing more,
I am not going to share all Book Experts, because I may miss...
But just in case, the list will be full with Book Authors.. who
Never used to say: 'unbalanced' term, sure before NNUE 2020!
Btw, who knows? if you will continue to search, you may find,
Even who used during 1980s the unbalanced term) but anyhow
There is one true: Unbalanced / Balanced term became popular,
And it's started often used since NNUE 2020 for sure! However,
You will never know all about, since you was not active in past!
Hope helps )
Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
Mar 8, 2010 : English - Anglo-Dutch defenseSedat wrote: ...since i was referring about who are experienced in our Computer Chess...

May 30, 2014 : An aggressive opening is always unbalanced

Dec 12, 2015 : GM Hikaru Nakamura often plays provocative, unbalanced openings...

Aug 27, 2016 : Properties of unbalanced openings using Bayeselo model




Re: How about we have a little laugh ?
Maybe at the SedatChess but not in the real world !Sedat wrote: ...in case of unbalanced openings,
Almost all wins when via Whites...
There are well-known opening lists with unbalanced openings without an huge advantage for white :
The "20 first legal moves" opening list
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) W D L D(%) OppAvg OppN
1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx) : 0 ---- 420.0 800 52.5 51 738 11 92.3 -18 20
2 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 79 20.0 40 50.0 1 38 1 95.0 0 1
3 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 79 19.5 40 48.8 0 39 1 97.5 0 1
4 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 75 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
5 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 82 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
6 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 76 19.5 40 48.8 0 39 1 97.5 0 1
7 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 79 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
8 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 81 19.5 40 48.8 0 39 1 97.5 0 1
9 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 78 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
10 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 78 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
11 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : -9 79 19.5 40 48.8 1 37 2 92.5 0 1
12 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx) : -18 77 19.0 40 47.5 1 36 3 90.0 0 1
13 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx) : -18 80 19.0 40 47.5 0 38 2 95.0 0 1
14 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx) : -18 79 19.0 40 47.5 0 38 2 95.0 0 1
15 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx) : -18 80 19.0 40 47.5 0 38 2 95.0 0 1
16 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx) : -26 77 18.5 40 46.3 0 37 3 92.5 0 1
17 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx) : -26 79 18.5 40 46.3 1 35 4 87.5 0 1
18 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx) : -26 81 18.5 40 46.3 0 37 3 92.5 0 1
19 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : -26 79 18.5 40 46.3 1 35 4 87.5 0 1
20 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : -35 78 18.0 40 45.0 1 34 5 85.0 0 1
21 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx) : -62 78 16.5 40 41.3 0 33 7 82.5 0 1
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00
The "silver gambit suite" opening list
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) W D L D(%) OppAvg OppN
1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx) : 0 ---- 562.0 1000 56.2 210 704 86 70.4 -44 20
2 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx) : -28 71 23.0 50 46.0 5 36 9 72.0 0 1
3 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : -28 68 23.0 50 46.0 5 36 9 72.0 0 1
4 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : -35 68 22.5 50 45.0 4 37 9 74.0 0 1
5 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx) : -35 69 22.5 50 45.0 5 35 10 70.0 0 1
6 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx) : -35 69 22.5 50 45.0 5 35 10 70.0 0 1
7 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx) : -35 69 22.5 50 45.0 4 37 9 74.0 0 1
8 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx) : -42 70 22.0 50 44.0 5 34 11 68.0 0 1
9 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : -42 72 22.0 50 44.0 5 34 11 68.0 0 1
10 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx) : -42 69 22.0 50 44.0 4 36 10 72.0 0 1
11 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx) : -42 70 22.0 50 44.0 5 34 11 68.0 0 1
12 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx) : -42 69 22.0 50 44.0 5 34 11 68.0 0 1
13 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 70 21.5 50 43.0 4 35 11 70.0 0 1
14 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 68 21.5 50 43.0 5 33 12 66.0 0 1
15 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 69 21.5 50 43.0 4 35 11 70.0 0 1
16 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 69 21.5 50 43.0 4 35 11 70.0 0 1
17 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 69 21.5 50 43.0 4 35 11 70.0 0 1
18 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx) : -49 69 21.5 50 43.0 4 35 11 70.0 0 1
19 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx) : -57 69 21.0 50 42.0 3 36 11 72.0 0 1
20 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx) : -57 70 21.0 50 42.0 3 36 11 72.0 0 1
21 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx) : -57 72 21.0 50 42.0 3 36 11 72.0 0 1
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00
etc.
And even from the start position (= no opening list), the advantage it is not neutral for white
Code: Select all
# PLAYER : RATING ERROR POINTS PLAYED (%) W D L D(%) OppAvg OppN
1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx) : 0 ---- 1006.5 2000 50.3 13 1987 0 99.3 -2 20
2 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 47 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
3 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
4 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 49 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
5 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
6 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
7 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 50 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
8 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
9 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 46 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
10 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 47 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
11 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 49 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
12 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
13 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 48 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
14 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx) : 0 49 50.0 100 50.0 0 100 0 100.0 0 1
15 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx) : -4 51 49.5 100 49.5 0 99 1 99.0 0 1
16 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx) : -4 47 49.5 100 49.5 0 99 1 99.0 0 1
17 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx) : -4 47 49.5 100 49.5 0 99 1 99.0 0 1
18 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx) : -4 51 49.5 100 49.5 0 99 1 99.0 0 1
19 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx) : -7 49 49.0 100 49.0 0 98 2 98.0 0 1
20 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx) : -11 48 48.5 100 48.5 0 97 3 97.0 0 1
21 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx) : -14 48 48.0 100 48.0 0 96 4 96.0 0 1
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00