How about we have a little laugh ?

Whatever else you want to talk about. Forum rules still apply.
rulleeeee
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:33 pm
Real Name: Grzesiek

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by rulleeeee » Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:25 am

deeds wrote:
Wed Mar 19, 2025 8:03 pm
In 2025, there is only one TD left who is still testing the EXP files with a concurrency > 1 :shock:


I remember when you tested higher concurrency than 1, then learning "went backwards". Halfway through training you switched to concurrency = 1, learning went up, but the damage caused by concurrency > 1 did its job.

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Thu Mar 20, 2025 11:28 am

rulleeeee wrote:
Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:25 am
I remember when you tested higher concurrency than 1, then learning "went backwards". Halfway through training you switched to concurrency = 1, learning went up, but the damage caused by concurrency > 1 did its job.
This one ?

rulleeeee
Posts: 51
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2014 6:33 pm
Real Name: Grzesiek

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by rulleeeee » Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:41 pm

Ah, I confused multipv with convergence... But I remember that you proved that concurrency greater than 1 "destroys" the experience file.

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Thu Mar 20, 2025 8:48 pm

rulleeeee wrote:
Thu Mar 20, 2025 7:41 pm
I remember that you proved that concurrency greater than 1 "destroys" the experience file.
evidence

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Fri Mar 28, 2025 3:54 pm

Iga761 wrote: ...have you noticed a big difference between Depth4 Exp lines and Depth4 2025 after playing for a while?...
source

Sedat wrote: ...My created Depth4 2025 is a BIN book (not Exp)!...
...so it will be madness, if its lines to be 100% same as EXP!...
source

:difus_rofl :difus_rofl :difus_rofl

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:14 pm

Sedat wrote: ...Since NNUE 2020, that means just a few years, someones started to use: Balanced / Unbalanced opening lines..
but before 2020 year, there was No such tern...
still having memory problems :?

Jan 10, 2009 : Unbalanced opening leads to impressive top-level game

Mar 8, 2010 : English - Anglo-Dutch defense

May 30, 2014 : An aggressive opening is always unbalanced

Dec 12, 2015 : GM Hikaru Nakamura often plays provocative, unbalanced openings...

Aug 27, 2016 : Properties of unbalanced openings using Bayeselo model

etc.

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Sat Mar 29, 2025 5:51 pm

Sedat wrote: ...I have no much idea about the differences But my 6th strong sense says that They should be close to each other...
source

But this Sedat's sixth sense has severe malfunctions :

ERROR MARGIN : 36% !!
Image
:difus_rofl

Sedat wrote:
deeds wrote: Yet you had already been warned about this problem
...About your warnings, Listen, you're so new in my eyes...
ERROR MARGIN : 52% !!!
Image
:difus_rofl

Sedat wrote: I will create a book, which will be tuned to prefer Depth4 Exp Series, played in latest months of 2025!
Image
:difus_rofl

Sedat Canbaz
Posts: 2263
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2023 6:29 am

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by Sedat Canbaz » Sun Mar 30, 2025 7:21 am

@To Deeds

Wow )) not bad 'search' by you ) but still not enough...since
I was referring about who are experienced in our Computer
Chess, such as by well-known testers who are from CCC, CCRL,
CEGT, CEDR, CSVN, FCP, FGRL, SPCC, SSDF, TCEC, TCERL, TOMs
Or other individuals TDs such as by Mehmet, Adam, Engeria,
Ipman, Jorge, RWBC, Sedat Canbaz, Sekos, Troid, Utzinger etc.
In other words, I never noticed that they used unbalanced term! sure
I mean before NNUE 2020..even if they used this term..not important..
But as most important thing is that, in case of unbalanced openings,
Almost all wins when via Whites.. understand ?) if still not clear ?
Chess is a game for 2 sides, at least it's so in my area where I live!

One thing more,
I am not going to share all Book Experts, because I may miss...
But just in case, the list will be full with Book Authors.. who
Never used to say: 'unbalanced' term, sure before NNUE 2020!

Btw, who knows? if you will continue to search, you may find,
Even who used during 1980s the unbalanced term) but anyhow
There is one true: Unbalanced / Balanced term became popular,
And it's started often used since NNUE 2020 for sure! However,
You will never know all about, since you was not active in past!

Hope helps )

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Sun Mar 30, 2025 10:40 am

Sedat wrote: ...since i was referring about who are experienced in our Computer Chess...
Mar 8, 2010 : English - Anglo-Dutch defense
:arrow: Red Hot Pawn Chess team ? At least, 24 years of experience !

May 30, 2014 : An aggressive opening is always unbalanced
:arrow: d_ahura ? At least, 14 years of experience !

Dec 12, 2015 : GM Hikaru Nakamura often plays provocative, unbalanced openings...
:arrow: Path To Chess Mastery team ? At least, 14 years of experience !

Aug 27, 2016 : Properties of unbalanced openings using Bayeselo model
:arrow: Kai Laskos ? At least, 9 years of experience !

:difus_rofl :difus_rofl :difus_rofl

User avatar
deeds
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:24 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: How about we have a little laugh ?

Post by deeds » Sun Mar 30, 2025 2:37 pm

Sedat wrote: ...in case of unbalanced openings,
Almost all wins when via Whites...
Maybe at the SedatChess but not in the real world !

There are well-known opening lists with unbalanced openings without an huge advantage for white :

The "20 first legal moves" opening list

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                              :  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)    W    D    L  D(%)  OppAvg  OppN
   1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx)            :       0   ----   420.0     800  52.5   51  738   11  92.3     -18    20
   2 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx)              :       0     79    20.0      40  50.0    1   38    1  95.0       0     1
   3 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx)       :      -9     79    19.5      40  48.8    0   39    1  97.5       0     1
   4 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx)          :      -9     75    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
   5 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx)             :      -9     82    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
   6 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx)    :      -9     76    19.5      40  48.8    0   39    1  97.5       0     1
   7 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx)         :      -9     79    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
   8 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx)     :      -9     81    19.5      40  48.8    0   39    1  97.5       0     1
   9 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx)             :      -9     78    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
  10 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx)          :      -9     78    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
  11 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)             :      -9     79    19.5      40  48.8    1   37    2  92.5       0     1
  12 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx)         :     -18     77    19.0      40  47.5    1   36    3  90.0       0     1
  13 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx)        :     -18     80    19.0      40  47.5    0   38    2  95.0       0     1
  14 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx)          :     -18     79    19.0      40  47.5    0   38    2  95.0       0     1
  15 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx)            :     -18     80    19.0      40  47.5    0   38    2  95.0       0     1
  16 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx)            :     -26     77    18.5      40  46.3    0   37    3  92.5       0     1
  17 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx)         :     -26     79    18.5      40  46.3    1   35    4  87.5       0     1
  18 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx)           :     -26     81    18.5      40  46.3    0   37    3  92.5       0     1
  19 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx)           :     -26     79    18.5      40  46.3    1   35    4  87.5       0     1
  20 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)              :     -35     78    18.0      40  45.0    1   34    5  85.0       0     1
  21 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx)                   :     -62     78    16.5      40  41.3    0   33    7  82.5       0     1
White advantage = -23.79 +/- 9.09
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00


The "silver gambit suite" opening list

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                              :  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)    W    D    L  D(%)  OppAvg  OppN
   1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx)            :       0   ----   562.0    1000  56.2  210  704   86  70.4     -44    20
   2 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx)             :     -28     71    23.0      50  46.0    5   36    9  72.0       0     1
   3 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)              :     -28     68    23.0      50  46.0    5   36    9  72.0       0     1
   4 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx)           :     -35     68    22.5      50  45.0    4   37    9  74.0       0     1
   5 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx)                   :     -35     69    22.5      50  45.0    5   35   10  70.0       0     1
   6 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx)         :     -35     69    22.5      50  45.0    5   35   10  70.0       0     1
   7 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx)            :     -35     69    22.5      50  45.0    4   37    9  74.0       0     1
   8 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx)          :     -42     70    22.0      50  44.0    5   34   11  68.0       0     1
   9 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)             :     -42     72    22.0      50  44.0    5   34   11  68.0       0     1
  10 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx)              :     -42     69    22.0      50  44.0    4   36   10  72.0       0     1
  11 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx)          :     -42     70    22.0      50  44.0    5   34   11  68.0       0     1
  12 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx)       :     -42     69    22.0      50  44.0    5   34   11  68.0       0     1
  13 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx)     :     -49     70    21.5      50  43.0    4   35   11  70.0       0     1
  14 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx)         :     -49     68    21.5      50  43.0    5   33   12  66.0       0     1
  15 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx)        :     -49     69    21.5      50  43.0    4   35   11  70.0       0     1
  16 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx)             :     -49     69    21.5      50  43.0    4   35   11  70.0       0     1
  17 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx)         :     -49     69    21.5      50  43.0    4   35   11  70.0       0     1
  18 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx)          :     -49     69    21.5      50  43.0    4   35   11  70.0       0     1
  19 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx)            :     -57     69    21.0      50  42.0    3   36   11  72.0       0     1
  20 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx)    :     -57     70    21.0      50  42.0    3   36   11  72.0       0     1
  21 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx)           :     -57     72    21.0      50  42.0    3   36   11  72.0       0     1
White advantage = 3.56 +/- 8.15
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

etc.

And even from the start position (= no opening list), the advantage it is not neutral for white

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER                              :  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)    W     D    L   D(%)  OppAvg  OppN
   1 Depth4_xxxxx (Eman 8.xx)            :       0   ----  1006.5    2000  50.3   13  1987    0   99.3      -2    20
   2 Optimus_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)             :       0     47    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   3 Cani_230323 (Eman 8.xx)             :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   4 Chucaro_4_UPD2 (Eman 8.xx)          :       0     49    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   5 hcanfree-upd (Eman 8.xx)            :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   6 Solista_010722 (Eman 8.xx)          :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   7 Mantis_DH1 (Eman 8.xx)              :       0     50    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   8 Olisfish_040623 (Eman 8.xx)         :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
   9 Canseven_140223 (Eman 8.xx)         :       0     46    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  10 StudentChess_140123 (Eman 8.xx)     :       0     47    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  11 Hubble_3.1 (Eman 8.xx)              :       0     49    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  12 Solista_Attack_v3 (Eman 8.xx)       :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  13 Sentinel_160623 (Eman 8.xx)         :       0     48    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  14 Agarta_040623 (Eman 8.xx)           :       0     49    50.0     100  50.0    0   100    0  100.0       0     1
  15 Brain_110323 (Eman 8.xx)            :      -4     51    49.5     100  49.5    0    99    1   99.0       0     1
  16 Leschats14062023 (Eman 8.xx)        :      -4     47    49.5     100  49.5    0    99    1   99.0       0     1
  17 ThunderWizard_310822 (Eman 8.xx)    :      -4     47    49.5     100  49.5    0    99    1   99.0       0     1
  18 Cute_130523 (Eman 8.xx)             :      -4     51    49.5     100  49.5    0    99    1   99.0       0     1
  19 NebulaRing178 (Eman 8.xx)           :      -7     49    49.0     100  49.0    0    98    2   98.0       0     1
  20 CallMeX_011122 (Eman 8.xx)          :     -11     48    48.5     100  48.5    0    97    3   97.0       0     1
  21 M13.8 (Eman 8.xx)                   :     -14     48    48.0     100  48.0    0    96    4   96.0       0     1
White advantage = 1.23 +/- 5.60
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

Post Reply