SedatChess

[Sedat Canbaz]

Thanks, Mr. Sedat

You are welcome Mr. Homayoun )

[Sedat Canbaz]

Source:
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=3554&p=29192#p29192

Unintentionally, a daily tester made a little ad for (your) experience files !

Code: Select all

   # PLAYER            :  RATING  ERROR  POINTS  PLAYED   (%)    W    D    L  D(%)  OppAvg  OppN
   1 RapTora 2.2 8c    :      17     29   157.0     300  52.3   23  268    9  89.3       0     1
   2 Eman 8.91 8c      :       0   ----   143.0     300  47.7    9  268   23  89.3      17     1

White advantage = 35.24 +/- 14.01
Draw rate (equal opponents) = 50.00 % +/- 0.00

eman 8.91 8c   : avg. D31, 001 959 ms/move, 000 300 games, 00 015 340 moves
raptora 2.2 8c : avg. D31, 001 826 ms/move, 000 300 games, 00 015 366 moves

Averages :
0 194 sec/game (3 min/game)
123 plies/game (102 played plies/game)

Game stages :
- opening @ avg. D27, 002 943 ms/move
- middleg @ avg. D30, 001 704 ms/move
- endgame @ avg. D37, 001 216 ms/move

games

SCCT's conditions :
- without an experience file trained on the match's opening list
- Concurrency > 1 with learning engine
- Eman 8.91 set to default settings Experience Book false training mode, stronger/newer NNUE net than Raptora
- RapTora 2.2 set to default settings Experience Book true tourney mode, weaker/older NNUE net than Eman

Under SCCT's conditions, even with a stronger/newer net, an engine can't win.

[Sedat Canbaz]

Unintentionally, a daily tester made a little ad for (your) experience files !

Hey Chameleon,

1st of all,
Don't use your 'perforated' UMBRELLA anymore!
Since already no any RAINING on the horizon )))

I mean it's already perfectly clear that
Deeds = botunnet

And next time,
If you are man...come with real, genuine name!!

Otherwise,
I'm not going to talk any more with your fake account..!

[Sedat Canbaz]

Meanwhile,

As other very important reference about
SCCT's used conditions are faster and
Better in quality than Deeds conditions:

E.g SCCT average move length: 61
In Deeds average move length: 64

If not clear,
E.g as usual, on faster machines,
The overall played length moves
Are ending in less moves...!!
Proved, guaranteed...!!

And that's why I'm much surprised:
2x EPYC 7B12's 8 Cores are faster
Than 2x E5-2660 v3's 40 Threads

And now I wonder much, (in reality)
Deeds testings are with 40 threads?
Is there any PROVE ?) maybe again
Deeds is fooling all of us here ?))

E.g RapTora is used. 32 threads
Where Eman is used: 40 threads

Or other scenario:

E.g RapTora is used. 24 threads
Where Eman is used: 30 threads

Etc. and etc.

Btw, why Deeds is not using Fritz GUIs ?
Frankly I'd prefer Fritz GUI, if nothing else
NPS values are perfectly clear...

On other hand, I used Cutechess GUI
Mainly due to offers a concurrent option...
Otherwise, I'd run Fritz GUI for sure !!

Greetings

[Sedat Canbaz]

Hello Chess Friends,

I'm pleased to announce,
Here is my latest tutorial:



For anyone missed, interested for previous part 1:
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=3648&start=100


Best,
Sedat

[Anton101]

Great, best regards!

[Sedat Canbaz]

Great, best regards!

Thank you )

Best wishes,
Sedat

[Anton101]

[Sedat Canbaz]

Dear Mr. Anton,

By the way,
Did you notice the latest new SCCT testing:
Raptora 2.2 8 cores vs Eman 8.91 8 cores ?

In other words,
I was wondering what will be the results
Under more serious Bullet test conditions...

And I hope you like it ?)

Greetings

[Anton101]

Great work as always dear Sedat...

Great tours, ideas, openning books, a lot of time invested and resources.

Just, thank you so much!